Ephemeral trace / permanent archive: the optics of manifested absence in the cultural space of the photographic portrait

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2026-3(16)-109-144

Keywords:

visual technologies, photography, portrait, selfie, self-presentation, performance, cultural context, sign system, pictorealism, visual studies, ephemeral trace, permanent archive

Abstract

This article explores the metamorphoses of the portrait genre in photography, which has evolved from a primary technical phenomenon capturing external resemblance to a ubiquitous practice of identity construction and self-presentation. It focuses not only on formal aesthetics but also on the profound sociocultural shifts accompanying this transition. Based on the material examined, the study identifies key social aspects and stylistic principles that shape the rethinking of fundamental concepts: collective and individual memory, plastic identity, and cultural heritage. A series of illustrations, including Julia Margaret Cameron's mystical stagings, A. Karelin's reconstructions of Russian antiquity, and performances featuring multiple alter egos, such as Sidney Sherman, allow us to trace diverse approaches to self-expression. It is emphasized that technological advances, as well as the decreasing cost of photography, are changing the perception of the portrait as objective documentary evidence. Thanks to this, portrait photography ceases to be merely a "frozen moment," transforming into a complex cultural and social construct reflecting individual and societal transformations, a dialogue between personal narrative and global cultural codes. It becomes part of a complex semiotic field that refracts processes of individual self-identification and reflects macrosocial shifts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olga Nevskaya, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russia

Senior Lecturer, Department of Graphic Design
e-mail: s244681@std.novsu.ru 

Denis Artamonov, Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia

Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of History and Social Studies Teaching Methods, Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Social Philosophy
e-mail: artamonovds@mail.ru

References

Adme Photo Awards: photo contest. (2015). Adme.ru: website. Moscow: URL: http://www.adme.ru/contest/photo2014/works/selfie (accessed: 23.06.2025).

Arago, D. F. (1949). Report on daguerreotype. In London, L. V. (comp.).
The History of the Invention of Photography: Collection of Documents
(pp. 15–21). Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian).

Averyanova, O. N. (2022). Photography / painting – the 19th century: from subject to content. Moscow: Bombora, Eksmo Publ. (In Russian).

Barthes, R. (2013). Camera lucida: comment on the photo. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ. (In Russian).

Baudelaire, C. (n.d.). Modern Public and Photography. Charles Pierre Baudelaire: website. URL: https://bodlers.ru/1859-Sovremennaja-publika-i-fotografija.html (accessed: 08.10.2025). (In Russian).

Budagyan, R. R. (2021). Digitalization in the space of media art (using
the examples of computer art, net art, digital photography, and digital painting). Vestnik Saratovskoy konservatorii. Voprosy iskusstvovedeniya,
11
, 22–29. (In Russian).

Cassirer, E. (1998). Favourites. An Experience of Man. Moscow: Gardarika Publ. (In Russian).

Cotton, S. (2020). Photography as Contemporary Art. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).

Kamiya, Y. (2018). The unbearable obscureness of being: An introduction to Yasumasa Morimura. Yasumasa Morimura: Ego obscura (pp. 13). New York:
The Japan Society.

Kasahara, M., & Fritsch, L. (2012). Morimura Yasumasa — Portrait (Futago). Art in Translation, 4 (4), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.2752/175613112X13445019280934

Makovsky, K. E. (2015). Portraits of Contemporaries. Moscow: Direct‑Media Publ. (In Russian).

Mayhew, H. (n.d.). London labour and the London poor. Vol. 3. London: Griffin, Bohnan and Company. Gutenberg.org: website. URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/57060/pg57060-images.
html#i_207
(accessed: 08.10.2025).

Menshikova, G. Ya., & Klumova, S. B. (2026). Strategies of Eye Movement in Recognizing Facial Expressions. National Psychological Journal, 21 (1), 81–93. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2026.0107

Nadar, F. (2019). When I Was a Photographer. St. Petersburg: Cloudberry Publ. (In Russian).

Netusova, T. M. (2015). Auto‑portrait as a special form of visual self‑presentation: a sociological analysis. Humanities, socio‑economic and social sciences, 6-1, 169–171. (In Russian).

Rudenok, K. (2021) “You’re judged by your clothes”: what the halo effect is and how it works. RBC Trends: website. URL: https://trends.rbc.ru/trends/social/6167f6909a7947f0672d4099?ysclid=mukydp09h8354420688 (accessed: 08.10.2025). (In Russian).

Shershneva, V. O. (2020). Digital art. Humanities in the modern university: yesterday, today, tomorrow: proceedings of the III-th International Scientific Conference, St. Petersburg, December 11, 2020: in 2 volumes, vol. 2
(pp. 955–960). Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design Publ. (In Russian).

Sontag, S. (2023). About photography. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press.
(In Russian).

Tolstoguzov, P. N. (2019). Photography as a functional element of the text of Russian literature of the second half of the 19th century. Bulletin of the Moscow State University. Sholom Aleichem, 2 (35), 58–62. (In Russian).

Published

2026-09-26

How to Cite

Nevskaya, O., & Artamonov, D. (2026). Ephemeral trace / permanent archive: the optics of manifested absence in the cultural space of the photographic portrait. Experience Industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies, 3 (16), 109–144. https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2026-3(16)-109-144