MARKERS OF CONTEMPORARY ART

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2023-2(3)-144-161

Keywords:

markers, contemporary art, values, art history, postmodernism

Abstract

The era of postmodernism in the art of modern society, as well as its connection to classical art forms are analyzed in this article. The transformation of contemporary art is associated with a change in the worldview of society, new technologies and other processes. Two opposite directions of creativity of modern artists are considered: populist and outrageous forms and traditional scenarios for the development of postmodern trends. Both areas of creative activity reflect the essence of modern society and are markers of their time. The viewer faces a difficult task: to distinguish true, genuine art from fakes for the sake of the market. All manifestations of modern art are to some extent a reminiscence of the well-known markers of previous eras.

 

For citation:
Okolovich, M. G., & Gulevich-Linkova, O. V. (2023). Markers of contemporary art. Experience industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies (EISCRT), 2 (3), 144-161. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2023-2(3)-144-161

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marina Okolovich, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russia

Candidate of Art History, Associate Professor of the Department of Technological and Art Education
e-mail: Marina.Okolovich@novsu.ru

Olga Gulevich-Linkova, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russia

Member of the Union of Artists of Russia, Associate Professor of the Department of Technological and Art Education
e-mail: olga.gulevich-linkova@novsu.ru

 

References

Antonova, A. (2018). Irina Antonova o sovremennom iskusstve [Irina Antonova on contemporary art]. Partner [Partner],5. Available at: https://www.partner-inform.de/partner/detail/2018/5/331/9015/irina-antonova-o-sovremennom-iskusstve?lang=ru (accessed: 20.03.2023). (In Russ).

Balueva, A. (2017). Irina Antonova: my` zhivem v e`poxu bol`shogo krizisa [Irina Antonova: we live in a time of great crisis]. Sobesednik [Interlocutor], 29. Available at: https://sobesednik.ru/kultura-i-tv/20170721-irina-antonova-my-zhivem-v-epohu-bolshogo-krizisa (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ).

Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekuchaya sovremennost` [Fluid modernity]. Sankt-Peterburg: Peter Publ. Available at: https://coollib.com/b/427264-igmunt-bauman-tekuchaya-sovremennost/read (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ).

Bodrijyar, Zh. (2011). Simvolicheskij obmen i smert` [Symbolic exchange and death]. Moscow: Dobrosvet, KDU Publ. (In Russ).

Dianova, V. M. (1999). Postmodernistskaya filosofiya iskusstva: istoki i so-vremennost` [Postmodern Philosophy of Art: Origins and Modernity]. Sankt-Peterburg: Petropolis Publ. (In Russ).

E`ko, U. (1989). Zametki na polyax «Imeni rozy`» [Notes on the pole of the "Name of the Rose"]. Available at: clck.ru/34V64m (accessed: 20.03.2023). (In Russ).

German, M. Yu. (2008). Modernizm. Iskusstvo pervoj poloviny` XX veka [Modernism. Art of the first half of the XX century]. Moscow: Azbuka Publ. (In Russ).

Kollingvud, R. D. (1999). Principy` iskusstva [Principles of Art]. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture Publ. (In Russ).

Konchalovskij, A. (2005, February 5). Pobeda ry`nka nad iskusstvom [Victory over art]. Rossijskaya gazeta [Rossiyskaya Gazeta]. Available at: clck.ru/34V62v (accessed: 20.03.2023). (In Russ).

Lagun, M. G. (2013). Konceptualizm kak reshenie problemy` xudozhestvenny`x universalij i materiala tvorchestva v iskusstve sovremennogo avangarda (postmodernizma) [Conceptualism as a solution to the problem of artistic universals and the material of creativity in the art of the modern avant-garde (postmodernism)]. Akademiya perepodgotovki rabotnikov iskusstva, kul`tury` i turizma [Academy of Retraining of workers of Art, Culture and Tourism], 3-4, 87-89. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23168567 (accessed: 20.08.2022). (In Russ).

Malenko, S. A. (2023). The Poles of the Experience Industry: From the Entertaining Leisure to the Ideologeme of "dehumanization". Experience industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies (EISCRT), 1 (2), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2023-1(2)-09-21

Man`kovskaya, N. B. (2000). E`stetika postmodernizma [Aesthetics of postmodernism]. Sankt-Peterburg: Alethea Publ. (In Russ).

Mozhejko, M. A. (2014). Ot postmodernizma k post-postmodernizmu: sovremenny`e sociokul`turny`e transformacii i novejshie tendencii filosofii [From Postmodernism to post-Postmodernism: Modern socio-cultural transformations and the latest trends in philosophy] Filosofskie issledovaniya [Philosophical research], 1, 59-70. (In Russ).

Shéleshneva-Solodóvnikova, N. A. (2018). The method of rethinking of the cultural heritage in Fernando Botero' work. Iberoamerica, 3, 129-14.

Viktorov, A. Sh. (2016). Aktual`noe i sovremennoe iskusstvo v kontekste postmodernizma [Contemporary and contemporary art in the context of postmodernism]. Kul`turnaya zhizn` yuga Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashhee, budushhee [Cultural life of the South of Russia: past, present, future], 104-113. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26119564 (accessed: 20.08.2022). (In Russ).

Volova, L. A. (2011). Postmodernizm v sovremennom izobrazitel`nom iskusstve [Postmodernism in Contemporary visual art]. Filosofskie problemy` informacionny`x texnologij i kiberprostranstva [Philosophical problems of information technology and cyberspace], 2, 55-66. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17335898 (accessed: 20.03.2023). (In Russ).

 

Downloads


Abstract views: 69

Published

2023-06-04

How to Cite

Okolovich, M., & Gulevich-Linkova, O. (2023). MARKERS OF CONTEMPORARY ART. Experience Industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies, (2 (3), 2023), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2023-2(3)-144-161

Issue

No. 2 (3), 2023: Experience industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies

Section

Traditions