MASS CULTURE: THE PURSUIT OF THE CONSUMER OR ITS PRODUCTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2024-3(8)-82-116

Keywords:

consumer society, mass culture, soft power, cultural hegemony, management technologies, postmodernity, society of the spectacle, trade revolution, postcapitalism, cultural industries, experience industries

Abstract

This article examines the mechanism of the formation of mass culture as a necessary component of a consumer society. It is noted that such a society is generated by the needs of capital, which, for expanded reproduction, is forced to use all other institutions of society, including culture, as its resource. Mass culture, used to stimulate the continuous and steadily increasing demand for goods and services, strives to activate only those motives in a person’s need state that should lead them to the market. For this purpose, the entire spectrum of cultural products is used, from the cinema (one of the most powerful means of influencing mass consciousness) to children’s toys, which, despite their “innocence”, nevertheless also directly participate in the promotion of consumer habits, shaping children have a certain lifestyle, which they will be forced to reproduce when they become adults and enter the market. Thus, mass culture becomes a zealous “servant” of the business bloc of society, performing not so much an integrative function as acting as a purely marketing tool designed to form stable consumer patterns among the population, which will allow the capitalist cycle to be reproduced indefinitely.

 

For citation:
Smirnov, V. A. (2024). Mass culture: the pursuit of the consumer or its production. Experience industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies (EISCRT), 3 (8), 82-116. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2024-3(8)-82-116

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vasiliy Smirnov, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russia

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Sociology
e-mail: novtransa2010@yandex.ru

 

References

Berger, P. (1995). Social'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sociologii znaniya. [The social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge]. Moscow: Medium Publ. (In Russ.).

Buneeva, M. V. (2011). Teoreticheskie osnovy analiza obshchestva potrebleniya [Theoretical foundations of the analysis of consumer society]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 6. Ekonomika [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Ser. 6. Economics], 6, 53-56. (In Russ.).

Gramsci, A. (1958). Izbrannye proizvedeniya v 3 tomah [ Selected works in 3 volumes]. Moscow: Publishing House of foreign literature. (In Russ.).

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1997). Dialektika Prosveshcheniya: Filosofskie fragmenty [Dialectics of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments]. Moscow: Medium Publ.; Saint-Petersburg: Juventus Publ. (In Russ.).

Ivanova, T. (n.d.). Apel'sinovaia pesnia [The Orange Song]. Available at: https://clck.ru/3CkhgF (acessed: 10.06.2024).

Kara-Murza, S. G. (2001). Manipulyaciya soznaniem [Manipulation of consciousness]. Moscow : Eksmo-Press. (In Russ.).

Kobzarenko, L. N. (2023). Obshchestvo potrebleniya v sociokul'turnoj paradigm [Consumer society in the socio-cultural paradigm]. Kant: Social science & Humanities, 2 (14), 56-60. (In Russ.).

Lester, D. Teoriya gegemonii Antonio Gramshi i ee sovremennoe zvuchanie [Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony and its modern sound]. Politnauka. PolitNauka - politologiia v Rossii i mire [Political science. Political science is political science in Russia and the world]. Available at: http://www.politnauka.org/library/classic/leyster.php (accessed: 28.03.2024).(In Russ.).

Levi-Strauss, K. (2001). Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural anthropology]. Moscow: Eksmo-Press. (In Russ.).

Malenko, S. A. (2024). Leisure in the space of the experience industry: from eliticity to massiveness. Experience industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies (EISCRT), 1 (6), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2024-1(6)-9-17

Marcuse, G. (2007). Eros i civilizaciya. Odnomernyj chelovek [Eros and Civilization. A one-dimensional man]. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russ.).

Miller, J. C. (2019). The «right to consume»? Re-thinking the dynamics of exclusion/inclusion in consumer society. Consuption markets & Culture, 22 (5-6), 1-14.

Ortega-y-Gasset, X. (1991). Estetika. Filosofiya kul'tury [Aesthetics. The philosophy of culture]. Moscow: Art Publ. (In Russ.).

Ovrutsky, A. V. (2010). Fenomenologiya obshchestva potrebleniya [The phenomenology of consumer society]. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie. Sociologicheskie nauki [Society. Wednesday. Development. Sociological sciences], 1, 17-131. (In Russ.).

Trofimov, S. V. (2019). Emil' Dyurkgejm o roli religii v obshchestvennoj zhizni. Obosnovanie vybora elementarnoj religii [Emile Durkheim on the role of religion in public life. The rationale for choosing an elementary religion]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Un-ta. Ser. 18. Sociologiya i politologiya [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Ser. 18. Sociology and Political Science], 25 (3), 173-196. (In Russ.).

Valevich, E. S., & Ilyina, A. N. (2015). Brending v obshchestve potrebleniya [Branding in the consumer society]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Social'nye nauki [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky. Social sciences], 1, 101-106. (In Russ.).

Weinmeister, A. V.,& Ivanova, Yu. V. (2017). Kul'turnye industrii i kreativnye industrii, granicy ponyatij [Cultural industries and creative industries, the boundaries of concepts]. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul'tury [International Journal of Cultural Studies], 1 (26), 38-48. (In Russ.).

Published

2024-08-15

How to Cite

Smirnov, V. (2024). MASS CULTURE: THE PURSUIT OF THE CONSUMER OR ITS PRODUCTION. Experience Industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies, (3 (8), 2024), 82–116. https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2024-3(8)-82-116