IS A GENIUS WHO TURNS OUT TO BE A TRANSGRESSIVE PERSON SHOCKING?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2024-3(8)-117-152

Keywords:

genius, creativity, transgressive personality, transgression, creative mind, imagination, imaginary world, aesthetic taste, outrageous

Abstract

The object of the study was a genius from the world of art. The research methods were phenomenological and existential onesl. Based on them, the author tries to understand the mechanisms that became the source of the emergence of the masterpiece as new, spiritually significant for humanity. Creativity, being the true existential of the artist’s existence, contributes to his transitions into imaginary worlds. This fact allows us to call a genius a transgressive personality. As a free and volitional act, transgression takes place within the person, involving them in imaginary worlds. The creative mind of a genius, through contemplation and imagination, perceiving various impulses and creatively transforming them, expands spaces, making it possible to touch the essence of existence and convey what is known in a work of art. Transgressive transition for the creator turns out to be a natural practice, allowing one to go beyond the boundaries of what is permitted. But from the outside, the genius, his ideas, emotions, actions and works look provocative, which allows them to be characterized as shocking. Breaking social norms and shocking people around, the genius and theur outrageousness outline new paths for the development of art.

 

For citation:
Iakovleva, E. L. (2024). Is a genius who turns out to be a transgressive person shocking? Experience industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies (EISCRT), 3 (8), 117-152. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2024-3(8)-117-152

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Elena Iakovleva, Kazan Innovative University named after V. G. Timiryasov, Kazan, Russia

Doctor of Philosophy Sciences, professor, Нead of the Department of Philosophy and Socio-Political Disciplines
e-mail: mifoigra@mail.ru

 

References

Barmenkov, E. (2017). Lestnica uspeha. Pochemu den'gi ne delajut nas schastlivymi [The ladder of success. Why money doesn't make us happy.]. Forbs [Forbes]. Available at: http://www.forbes.ru/karera-i-svoy-biznes/353527-lestnicauspeha-pochemu-dengi-ne-delayut-nas-schastlivymi (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ.).

Bataj, Zh. (1997). Vnutrennij opyt [Internal experience]. Saint-Petersburg: The Axiom of Mithril Publ. (In Russ).

Bataj, Zh. (2000). Zhertvoprinoshenija [Sacrifices]. Locus Solus: Antologija literaturnogo avangarda ХХ veka [Locus Solus: An anthology of the literary avant-garde of the twentieth century] (pp. 101-110). Saint-Petersburg: Amphora Publ. (In Russ).

Bataj, Zh. (2007). Istorija jerotizma [The history of eroticism]. Moscow: The logo Publ. (In Russ.).

Bobrikov, S. A. (2012). Status tvorchestva v jekzistencial'nom prostranstve cheloveka [The status of creativity in the existential space of man]. Carskosel'skie chtenija [Tsarskoye Selo readings], 205–209. (In Russ).

Chernov, S. V. (2013). Problema genial'nosti v kontekste filosofskoj antropologii [The problem of genius in the context of philosophical anthropology]. Filosofija i kul'tura [Philosophy and Culture], 12, 1757–1769. Available at: https://www.institutnpo.ru/science/publikatsii/articles/89-problema-genialnosti-v-kontekste-filosofskoj-antropologii (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ.).

Chernov, S. V. (2018). Triadicheskaja dialektika genial'nosti [The triadic dialectic of genius]. Filosofskaja shkola [Philosophical School], 6. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/triadicheskaya-dialektika-genialnosti (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ.).

Cvetuhina, E. A., & Tolstikov, D. A. (2018). K vozmozhnosti fenomenologii voobrazhenija [Towards the possibility of a phenomenology of imagination]. Vestnik Omskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovanija [Bulletin of Omsk Pedagogical University. Humanitarian Studies], 2 (19), 41–43. (In Russ.).

Fuko, M. (1994). O transgressii [About transgression]. Tanatografija Jerosa: Zhorzh Bataj i francuzskaja mysl' serediny ХХ veka [The Thanatography of Eros: Georges Bataille and French Thought of the mid-twentieth century] (pp. 111-132). Saint-Petersburg: Mithril Publ. (In Russ).

Jakovleva, E. L. (2023). Jekzistencial'no-fenomenologicheskij podhod k ponimaniju tvorcheskogo processa [An existential-phenomenological approach to understanding the creative process]. Chelovek. Kul'tura. Obrazovanie [Human. Culture. Education], 3, 101–119. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.34130/2233-1277-2023-3-101

Kant, I. (1994). Kritika sposobnosti suzhdenija [Criticism of the faculty of judgment]. Moscow: Art Publ. (In Russ).

Klejberg, Ju. A. (2016). Kreativnaja deviantologija [Creative deviantology]. Moscow: Information and Publishing Department of Moscow State Regional University. (In Russ).

Kormin, N. A. (2022). I. Kant: kak vozmozhno jesteticheskoe? [I. Kant: how is aesthetic possible?]. Filosofija i kul'tura [Philosophy and Culture], 4, 60–112. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/i-kant-kak-vozmozhno-esteticheskoe (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2022.4.37815

Kozielecki, J. (2001). Psychotransgresjonizm: nowy kierunek psychologii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie „Żak”.

Malenko, S. A. (2022). Vysokaja koncentracija vpechatlenij: chuvstva, obrazy, idei. [High concentration of impressions: feelings, images, ideas]. Industrii vpechatlenij. Tehnologii sociokul'turnyh issledovanij (EISCRT) [Experience industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies (EISCRT)], 1 (1), 09–13. https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2022-1(1)-09-13 (In Russ).

Platon. Pir [Feast]. Istoriia Drevnego Rima [The History of Ancient Rome]. Available at: https://lyl.su/75AD (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ.).

Pufal'-Struzik, I. (2002). Tvorcheskij put' v "transgressivnoj koncepcii lichnosti" Ja. Kozeleckogo [The creative path in the "transgressive concept of personality" by Y. Kozeletsky]. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 7 (2), 76–85. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/pse/archive/2002_n2/Pufal_Struznik (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ.).

Shlegel', A. (2013). Nejrofiziologi sostavili kartu "centra voobrazhenija" v mozge cheloveka [Neurophysiologists have mapped the "center of imagination" in the human brain]. RIA Novosti [RIA News]. Available at: https://ria.ru/20130916/963614750.html (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ.).

Spektor, D. M. (2016). Obrechennost' i transgressija. Zh. Bataj [Doom and transgression. J. Bataille]. Psiholog [Psychologist], 40–52. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=19702 (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ.).

Stolovich, L. N. (1978). Filosofija krasoty [The philosophy of beauty]. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.).

Stupin, S. S. (2020). Homo faber. Kreativnost' kak jekzistencial chelovecheskogo bytija [Homo faber. Creativity as an existential of human existence]. Hudozhestvennaja kul'tura [Art Culture], 2, 8–31.

Vikel'gren, I. (2023). Gde zhivet voobrazhenie v vashem mozgu [Where the imagination lives in your brain]. Return & Refund Policy. Available at: https://lyl.su/rg4K (accessed: 21.05.2024). (In Russ).

Zadorozhnjuk, I. A. (2000). Tvorchestvo [Creation]. Chelovek. Filosofsko-jenciklopedicheskij slovar' [Human. Philosophical and encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ).

Downloads


Abstract views: 79

Published

2024-08-15

How to Cite

Iakovleva, E. (2024). IS A GENIUS WHO TURNS OUT TO BE A TRANSGRESSIVE PERSON SHOCKING?. Experience Industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies, (3 (8), 2024), 117–152. https://doi.org/10.34680/EISCRT-2024-3(8)-117-152

Issue

No. 3 (8), 2024: Experience industries. Socio-Cultural Research Technologies

Section

Reflections